Skip to content

chore: updates to glibc vs musl#2902

Merged
jspeed-meyers merged 3 commits intochainguard-dev:mainfrom
tdunlap607:musl-glibc-updates
Jan 20, 2026
Merged

chore: updates to glibc vs musl#2902
jspeed-meyers merged 3 commits intochainguard-dev:mainfrom
tdunlap607:musl-glibc-updates

Conversation

@tdunlap607
Copy link
Contributor

After discussions with @catherinejones on the glibc-vs-musl.md documentation, I removed several portions of the doc and focused more on speed/compatibility.

The changes removed the buffer overflow, DNS issues (outdated), experimental warnings, and unsupported debug features. Old outdated references were pruned throughout the documentation as well.

Thank you @catherinejones for your thoughtful feedback. Please review at your convenience. Thank you!

cc @cartyc

@tdunlap607 tdunlap607 self-assigned this Jan 15, 2026
@tdunlap607 tdunlap607 requested a review from a team as a code owner January 15, 2026 20:18
@tdunlap607 tdunlap607 added the documentation Improvements or additions to documentation label Jan 15, 2026
@netlify
Copy link

netlify bot commented Jan 15, 2026

Deploy Preview for ornate-narwhal-088216 ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 6114552
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/projects/ornate-narwhal-088216/deploys/696f85b34d87680008c06d41
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-2902--ornate-narwhal-088216.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify project configuration.

Copy link
Collaborator

@matthewhelmke matthewhelmke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you for handling this update, @tdunlap607, based on the feedback from @catherinejones, who deserves a special shout out!

The deletions make sense and the changes are clear. So, LGTM and approved!

Copy link
Collaborator

@matthewhelmke matthewhelmke left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I like the new section and retaining the discussed link in it. Thanks!

@jspeed-meyers jspeed-meyers self-requested a review January 16, 2026 14:59
Copy link

@jspeed-meyers jspeed-meyers left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM. Thank you, @tdunlap607, for the PR and @catherinejones for the feedback and expertise.

Copy link

@catherinejones catherinejones left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you! I left a couple of small suggestions, but this looks good to me! :)

@tdunlap607
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thank you again @catherinejones! The feedback is truly appreciated. Please feel free to reach out if you spot any other issues.

@jspeed-meyers
Copy link

Thank you, @tdunlap607, for the fixes and revisions. Thank you again, @catherinejones, for the thoughtful critique. Hopefully we gained a small bit of credibility back! 😆 😢

And please keep sending the feedback our way!

I'm going to merge this PR.

@jspeed-meyers jspeed-meyers merged commit 4ed2934 into chainguard-dev:main Jan 20, 2026
8 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

documentation Improvements or additions to documentation

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants